A number of people have wondered why there’s no trial version of King of Dragon Pass. After all, we know that our Windows/Mac demo, which ends after one year, helped convince people to buy the full game.
In fact, we think a trial would be the best way to introduce people to the game. (The casual game industry did a fair amount of testing, and found that sales were best when they offered a 60 minute free trial.)
But, according to the App Store Review Guidelines,
2.9 Apps that are "beta", "demo", "trial", or "test" versions will be rejectedwhich is pretty definitive.
So we would need to come up with something that is a self-contained game. A common approach is to offer a “Lite” (sic) version with say 10 levels, and a paid version (ideally through in-app purchase) with 100 levels. But King of Dragon Pass is really not this sort of game. What kind of story just stops arbitrarily after one year? Or even ten? Many games would make this more acceptable by having a score, but again, King of Dragon Pass tells a story, not a number.
So far we haven’t come up with any ideas that seem likely to pass App Store review. So we’ve been putting development energy into things like VoiceOver support or an iPad version.
The App Store policy is just begging to be cheated.
ReplyDeleteThere are many ways you could offer a limited KoDP, just a few off my mind:
-No clan member generation so that eventually you'll run out of people.
-Limited map and/or limited NPC clans
-Only 1 or 3 HQs, disabled shrines and blessings
-Or you might "cheat" the AppStore policy by jacking up the apocalypse events.
etc etc.
Careful there! “If you attempt to cheat the system (for example, by trying to trick the review process, steal data from users, copy another developer's work, or manipulate the ratings) your apps will be removed from the store and you will be expelled from the developer program.”
ReplyDeleteI do think Outis' ideas #2, 3 are good ones. Limit the game options with fewer clans, smaller map, no or limited exploration and no shrines. All things that are fun and really helpful, but not essential.
ReplyDeleteI still think you could release a lite version that runs for X number of years. It doesn't matter that KODP isn't the kind of game that can stop after a short period of time; it's supposed to be a lite version that gives potential customers a taste of how the game looks and plays. Nothing more, nothing less. A game that costs £7 needs and should have a lite version.
ReplyDelete£7 is a bargain for a game of this calibre. Just because we've been spoiled by ultra-cheap mass market games shouldn't make us short-sighted about the value of more complex and subtle offerings. The App Store has skewed the cost-value equation beyond all recognition.
ReplyDeleteDon't get me wrong; I have no issue with paying for quality iPhone games. I have spent in excess of £150 ($200) on games for my iPhone and I have no issue with supporting decent developers. I'm just saying that a relatively high-value game like KODP should have a lite version as there is no real reason why it shouldn't. With all respect to the developer, their explanation above isn't really convincing. I am not suggesting their product is overpriced; on the contrary, the sales figures speak for themselves and show that people are happy to pay for quality. It is not pricing I have issue with, it is the fact that there is no lite version when there really should be.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, it is not for me to judge them. If they would rather concentrate their efforts on honing the existing game, then that is commendable.
The fact that app prices are so low is neither here nor there; no one is forcing developers to produce apps for the iOS platform. If you want to get rich, then with very few exceptions, the App Store is not the place to do it.
Hi, everybody!
ReplyDeleteI think this discussion misses the core question here: "Would it possible to publish a free verison of K.o.D.P on the AppStore?".
Despite the pros and cons on it, the answer is quite clearly: "Yes, it would be possible!". Other publishers have proven that it is possible, with many many other games in many many different ways. K.o.D.P. is a game, and not that very special, to make it an exception to the rule.
I want to encourage you to publish a free version. I think I really would like to buy the game. But: no try, no buy!
I don't say it would be easy, just like 1-2-3. But it would be possible! And to hide behind the AppStore regulations, to spare you the effort of it, really is not a strong argument.
If you wanted to do it, you could do it. So it seems more like, you don't really want to do it, for whatever reasons.
As for myself, it all comes down to simply this: if you want to sell a copy of K.o.D.P. to me, then put a free version of it on the AppStore. Or, alternatively, go on a limited sale for 0,79€ (0,99$). But, I will definitely NOT buy the game for 4,99€ or even 7,99€ without having had an oppertunity to get an experience on what I will get, if I put my money into it. Sorry!
Besides all of this: I think it is a pretty good idea to look for ways to violate the bloody Apple regulations, when it is in the app buyers' interest and not too likely to harm the app seller. I didn't sell my soul to Apple and I wish for you you didn't either. Kick their balls. They sure deserve it for putting pressure on you and me like this.
Freedom of choice is a value! And creativity can beat the system. And when the system is about to crunch us, we have all rights in the world to BEAT THE SYSTEM! DO IT!
No, the core question is really: what would a free version *BE*. We don’t have a great answer yet.
ReplyDeleteCan you limit the number of years that can be played in a day? One year per day leaves you asking for more, doesn't ruin the narration and it would be a perfect solution for a "just one more turn" experience like KoDP.
ReplyDeleteThat sounds exactly like what Apple would limit ("demo" or "trial")…
ReplyDeleteThe problem is coming up with a version that is limited, but not limited in the ways Apple prohibits. Games with levels have it easy. Angry Birds an give you a complete, 10-level (or whatever) experience, that you can play at your own pace. The structure of KoDP makes that a lot harder.
So, while I'd really like to carry on the argument about what the core question here is ... Wouldn't get us anywhere. ;-)
ReplyDeleteDavid D. said: "The core question here is: what would a free version *BE*. We don't have a great answer yet."
I can't tell, if the proposals made concerning the features of a free version, are a great answer to that question. But they are: proposals, ideas. So, there is something to start from.
What David says here, is always pointing in that one direction: "Sorry, we can't make a free version because of AppStore regulations and the very special kind of game K.o.D.P. is, compared to others.". I really don't agree with that attitude!
David: it is YOU to think and come up with an answer to THAT question. And again: it would be possible! But instead, you keep declining all proposals and critics, over and over again.
I get a feeling, there really is something else behind all of this and we won't get to know what it is. Make a move! It's YOUR turn to come up with some answers and a solution to a free version!
I really don't like your attitude. Come up with something or I and hopefully a lot of other people interested in K.o.D.P. will be gone for good.
Thousands of 'lite' versions really make this a non-existent problem. Does anyone seriously think there are no 'demos' or 'trials' on appstore? Honestly? I've got half a dozen installed right now! Angry Birds Lite wasn't rejected, nor were any of the hundreds of other hits you get if you search the appstore for 'lite'. Apple even gave developers in-app purchases so users could upgrade from 'lite' versions to 'full' versions by paying money ingame.
ReplyDeleteThere are articles many years old about these guidelines, like http://www.tuaw.com/2009/02/08/app-store-demo-no-lite-yes/ . I hope this helps clear up what is a very bizarre confusion.
'Of course, there's a grey area there -- what features are central to the app, exactly? But Erica boils it down to words: putting "Lite" or "Free" in the title are fine, but releasing "Demo" or "Beta" versions are not.'
Case closed. The real issue is how you'd cut KoDP down, and not whether it's 'allowed'. I suggest you ask some Apple representative if limiting years is acceptable, because limiting levels and requiring purchases to unlock more is obviously fine.